Dinner and a Show but Without the Show

So apparently there's something special about today. Champions League re starting? A day without a handshake being in the news?

No? Okay I'm at a loss, seems like a normal Tuesday to me.

Any how in the footballing world it's been a rather busy day, and that's before Europe's aforementioned premier club competition restarts with the knock-out stages, but then when was the last time there was a quiet day?

Today's stories, as with most of the recent controversial football stories, were shrouded with lots of mystery and confrontation. In the North West of England we've been reintroduced to an old 'friend' of the region in the form of Carlos Tevez.

Meanwhile in Glasgow and Portsmouth, two cities separated by roughly 440 miles but never closer in footballing terms than today, issues of a far more serious nature were unravelling. Both Glasgow Rangers and Portsmouth F.C owe millions of pounds to HMRC  and have been forced to go into, or apply for, administration. Football clubs building up so much debt is not a new thing nor is football clubs having to go into administration, Portsmouth themselves have already had to take this measure as recently as 2009, but it is striking the regularity that football clubs, which now fully accept need to run as much as businesses as any other  business, find themselves in trouble.

Ibrox

The case of Rangers is the story attracting the most headlines, and rightly so, because of the size of the club involved and because of the massive effect the 10 point reduction, as a consequence of going into administration, will have on their season. What?! Really?! They've lost points and they're still in second place? Right well the first point still stands. Rangers are a massive club, they're in Europe every season and have won the domestic league 54 times. Of course the reason Rangers have managed to hold onto second place, despite the 10 point loss, is that the Scottish league is essentially a two horse race, every year- like The Boat Race with members of other Universities throwing stones to slow down the Oxford and Cambridge boats- with Rangers contending with their city rivals Celtic.

Celtic fans will not shed a tear for their rivals downfall, and many will be hoping that Rangers fall from grace continues with insolvency the next punishment for them, and they will no doubt point to the Gers spending beyond their means to win trophy after trophy for the previous few years as well as their already built in hatred for the team from Ibrox as reason for their glee. And who can really blame them? Those of us who are United fans may have been crossing our fingers for the same to happen to Liverpool when previous owners Hicks and Gillett  attempted to run the club into the ground. But the truth is that we need each other, much as Celtic need Rangers. Of course, there are Celtic fans who will refute my last statement, again, they will find reasons- they will point to a time, in the 80's when Aberdeen, Dundee United, Hearts and Motherwell regularly competed for top honours, they will point to continued yearly profit being made by their club and at an average attendance that is the 12th best in Europe but these would all be fickle arguments.

The very fact Rangers will still be in 2nd place in the league automatically throws out the argument that there is other competition to Celtic's thrown, perhaps in the 80's this was not the case but only once since 1996 have one of Celtic or Rangers finished outside the top two, and that was in 2006 when Hearts finished 2nd, a team on the brink of administration themselves. Celtic may well hold onto their fantastic support in the absence of Rangers but it is in their profits where they will surely be hit hardest. With no Rangers there is clearly no competition and with no competition there is less appetite for an already floundering league and by consequence television companies, like Sky and ESPN, will refuse to pay as much for T.V rights, if they indeed want them at all. The Hoops may think that joining the English leagues would act as a reprieve from this but there is currently not much call for them to join and there would be less so without Rangers.

Overall my argument would be that football fans need to stop being so partisan sometimes, be it in cases of racial abuse, seeing a magical player return to the Premier League or seeing a team go into administration but actually there is one more argument that allows for partisanship;

Who won't miss moments like this

Let's suggest I am completely wrong, as usual, and Celtic can 'survive' without their rivals. They can win competitions whilst being pushed all the way by another Scottish football team and continue to make profit whilst bringing in near 50,000 supporters every week, wouldn't there still be something missing? Even as someone who shows little interest in Scottish football there are always 4 dates that excite me- Old Firm matches! Without Rangers Celtic Park will not pulse and vibrate with the sort of passion and vitriol that those occasions create.

Now back to today what in the world is it? Oh wait it's not Valentines Day is it? Fortunately I've no girlfriend so I won't get in trouble for forgetting. And with no one to take out I'm like Celtic- surviving is fine but what's dinner without the show!

Football's West Lothian Affair!

Welcome to the English Premier league, home of some of the world’s greatest teams, players, managers, coaches and stadiums. Not all of them English admittedly, and I mean that for the players, managers, coaches and to an extent the stadiums, although the choice of Australian builders for Wembley wasn’t what you’d call an inspired choice, but the teams are most certainly English.

Welcome to the Scottish Premier league, home of some of Scotland’s best teams, players, managers, coaches and stadiums- well it has all of Scotland’s teams, for now!

There may be no greater tragedy in domestic football if than if Glasgow’s powerhouses of Scottish football, Celtic and Rangers, were to join the English leagues.

There can only be one reason for these two sides to want to join the elite this side of the border, money. Many will suggest it is for success but it is clear that this is an afterthought as it is money that breeds success and not the other way round in most cases. In most domestic leagues throughout, certainly Europe if not the World, there is usually only three or four clubs who are likely to win the league. I don’t need to go through the list of the main players in England, Italy, France, Germany, Spain or Scotland we know them all. But look at Russia, Austria, Belgium, Israel, Portugal, Ukraine, Holland it is always the same teams competing in the European competitions, we can only assume it’s therefore the same teams picking up trophies domestically.

It is also the same clubs who win the big prizes in Europe, mainly from England, Spain and Italy. There has of course been the odd surprise from, say, Portugal or Germany. There is also the ever unpredictable UEFA Cup/Europa League which throws up winners from all over the place, although this may end now with the new set up favouring consistency as it’s more esteemed cousin the Champions League. Consistency means the strongest teams will always rise to the top and lowers the risk of upset. So expect Champions League drop outs or those who struggled domestically last season, and ended in the 2nd tier of European football, to be competing in Hamburg come May.

The point here really is that Celtic and Rangers have no divine right to the money that the English league generates, funny way to suggest it I know, but basically being the most successful club/s by a country mile in a below par domestic league is not exactly a one off, unique in only Scotland. It happens everywhere, and yet there isn’t to my knowledge any question of Anderlecht and Standard Liege joining the Dutch leagues just because the two countries are neighbours.

Actually the whole thing is extremely laughable for one big reason! In 2012 there will be some small multi-sport event in London, you may have heard of it, the Olympics I think it’s called. In said event there is a football medal up for grabs. England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have never competed in the football at the Olympics. The reason for this is because at the Olympics the four nations compete together as Great Britain, at football they compete separately with separate Football Associations. With the Olympics being held on home soil the BOA (British Olympic Association) thought it would be a jolly good idea to enter as many, if not all, sports available. The English F.A thought a football team in the Olympics would also be a jolly good idea. The Northern Irish, Scottish and Welsh F.As on the other hand were all worried about their status as separately competing nations when it comes to footballing matters. I think we all agree a fair argument. How then can it be a good idea for Celtic and Rangers, the two sides from Scotland with any remote chance of making an impact internationally, to compete in English competitions, where they have little or no chance of qualifying for said international competitions? Way to show some patriotism!

Some north of the border have suggested that it would be good for the Glasgow monopoly on all competitions to flee. After all it would bring serious competition back to the league and bring the crowds back to the grounds. Cue all those south of the border with Sky Sports channels switching off as soon as Inverness vs. Aberdeen kicks off. A lack of Celtic and Rangers in the league would not make the rest of the clubs better teams, it would just get of the two decent sides. The league might come down to more than just the four Glasgow derbies in a season but only a few seasons of Aberdeen and Hearts reign (these clubs are an example) would mean they instantly became a lot richer than the likes of Falkirk due to European money, suddenly two new ‘superpowers’ of Scottish football and we’re back to square one, great!

Meanwhile down in England! “Welcome to Parkhead on this cold Saturday afternoon as Celtic take on Portsmouth”, just think of the hoards of Pompey fans wanting to make the long, and no doubt, expensive trip to Glasgow during these times of recession. Fans of both Celtic and Rangers will tell you that atmosphere’s at their grounds are amazing, and no doubt the games I’ve watched that these teams take part in have seen great crowds, but then again I only watch derby games and European nights so it’s hardly surprising. The fact is that most, if not all, team’s fans are the same. Loud away from home, loud at big games, loud when the mood suits them, but quiet a lot of the time and there to watch football being played and not make ridiculous amounts of noise all the time. The other thing I’d say for the fans is that I went through Manchester the night after Rangers UEFA cup final loss and I’d rather not see my city looking like that again thanks, one off maybe but I still don't want another potential Milwall or Leeds.

Celtic and Rangers aren’t good enough to compete week in week out in the Premier League, maybe one day, with all the money the Premier League generates, they will be. But that’s the point; they have done nothing to warrant all that money. I’ll tell you what my Sunday league football club could do with all that money and then we’ll start our Europa League campaign!